 Iremat 2004-10-11 . chapter 3Beautiful. I loved it. Very well done. Write more. |
 Truthwriter 2003-03-31 . chapter 3niice i like your description of emotions
you have a real creative storyline too
and 'self-righteous suicide'
system of a down is tyte |
 the number 2003-03-25 . chapter 3gay, stupid, no like. |
 the number 2003-03-25 . chapter 2same thing, stupid chapter, stupid story. I don't like it, it's gay, like you. |
 the number 2003-03-25 . chapter 1this story sucks, big time. actually, I'm surprised they allow such garbage here at fanfiction. How long did it take you to write this thing? 'cause I'll tell you this, you wasted every second. |
 Qualinesti 2002-11-30 . chapter 1Oh, very nice ending to the first chapter! This is pretty well done, and I love the descriptions you give things, especially the Amazon city. (And that you use the spelling Trag'Oul, even after the debut of the expansion and its false god, Trang'Oul!)
Your scenes really stand out in my imagination. So, back to reading! |
 Nibakanus 2002-11-12 . chapter 2Very nice, I like the descriptive qualities of the story so far... |
 Ali 2002-11-12 . chapter 3 GREAT FIC!!! a bit short but very very good. I loved it. Especially the detail you paid to the Cult of Rathma. I just wish you had made the story bigger. I want more!!! |
 Icy Mike Molson 2002-11-11 . chapter 1Okay, so I reviewed once, but I don't think it went through, so if this all sounds really familiar, well, you can delete this one.
This introduction is very good. You escape the pitfalls of Diablo writing nicely(the characters are more than a collection of skills, and you just aren't wandering around slaughtering everything in sight). The descritpions are also dead on, allowing us to get a glimpse of the Amazon nation and the characters themselves. The story is catching and interesting ernough to keep the reader wanting to come back and read more.
Grammatically, you lose some points, but not a whole lot. There were some misspelled words scattered around, and you pulled the cardinal sin: "rouge" for "rogue". I can't understand that problem, but that's a completely different story that would take me far too long to go into at this point. There were also a couple of run on sentences, and that bizarre, and apparently widespread, problkem of not being able to differentiate between possessive and contractive forms of words. However, you managed to keep hte overall story clean(despite these errors) and comprehensible, allowing for me to get past the stumbling blocks and enjoy the story. This doesn't mean don't correct them; it just means that with a little bit of fine tuning, the story will be extrmely good in my eyes.
So keep an eye o nthe grammar in the future, and definitely keep going with this one... |
|