Help
Home Just In Communities Forums Beta Readers Dictionary Search
Reviews for: Burning the Waste
Iremat
2004-10-11 . chapter 3
Beautiful. I loved it. Very well done. Write more.
Truthwriter
2003-03-31 . chapter 3
niice i like your description of emotions
you have a real creative storyline too
and 'self-righteous suicide'
system of a down is tyte
the number
2003-03-25 . chapter 3
gay, stupid, no like.
the number
2003-03-25 . chapter 2
same thing, stupid chapter, stupid story. I don't like it, it's gay, like you.
the number
2003-03-25 . chapter 1
this story sucks, big time. actually, I'm surprised they allow such garbage here at fanfiction. How long did it take you to write this thing? 'cause I'll tell you this, you wasted every second.
Qualinesti
2002-11-30 . chapter 1
Oh, very nice ending to the first chapter! This is pretty well done, and I love the descriptions you give things, especially the Amazon city. (And that you use the spelling Trag'Oul, even after the debut of the expansion and its false god, Trang'Oul!)

Your scenes really stand out in my imagination. So, back to reading!
Nibakanus
2002-11-12 . chapter 2
Very nice, I like the descriptive qualities of the story so far...
Ali
2002-11-12 . chapter 3
GREAT FIC!!! a bit short but very very good. I loved it. Especially the detail you paid to the Cult of Rathma. I just wish you had made the story bigger. I want more!!!
Icy Mike Molson
2002-11-11 . chapter 1
Okay, so I reviewed once, but I don't think it went through, so if this all sounds really familiar, well, you can delete this one.
This introduction is very good. You escape the pitfalls of Diablo writing nicely(the characters are more than a collection of skills, and you just aren't wandering around slaughtering everything in sight). The descritpions are also dead on, allowing us to get a glimpse of the Amazon nation and the characters themselves. The story is catching and interesting ernough to keep the reader wanting to come back and read more.
Grammatically, you lose some points, but not a whole lot. There were some misspelled words scattered around, and you pulled the cardinal sin: "rouge" for "rogue". I can't understand that problem, but that's a completely different story that would take me far too long to go into at this point. There were also a couple of run on sentences, and that bizarre, and apparently widespread, problkem of not being able to differentiate between possessive and contractive forms of words. However, you managed to keep hte overall story clean(despite these errors) and comprehensible, allowing for me to get past the stumbling blocks and enjoy the story. This doesn't mean don't correct them; it just means that with a little bit of fine tuning, the story will be extrmely good in my eyes.
So keep an eye o nthe grammar in the future, and definitely keep going with this one...
Return to Top