I would love to see what you write next. Your a great writer and your stories are great too.



Thank you,



Terri

Well, that was an interesting year. Poor Harry spent just about all of it in a company (but at least he got to see his mother). Very different from JKR's Fifth year (but Ginny played Seeker in both!). You've resolved Tyls. And are moving Harry and Niamh closer (though how Cedric ever came into the picture, I don't understand -- just a twist on canon).

'A zombie’s na ‘uman anymore. They’ve na goh a soul. Somebody else controls ‘em.' -- then why couldn't/wouldn't Tyls obey Voldie's order to kill Harry? Wouldn't he have simply carried out the killing without considering other's being around. The first failure could be explained by the notion that he couldn't carry out Voldie's orders because he was supposed to see Harry's eyes as he died (which he couldn't while Harry was in a coma); but not after Voldie told him to kill Harry anyway.

'Know about this? No, sir.' -- Didn't she say he was dead? How could she not then at least suspect (if not know) that necromancy was involved?
'Why did you never mention this?' -- Didn't she mention it in front of everyone in the Great Hall? (cf. ch. 11/114) And it was loud enough that in the next chapter (12/115), Snape asks her, 'one wonders why you claim that boy is dead.' How is it Snape heard but Dumbledore didn't (considering 'every student (and most of the professors) in the Hall watched the confrontation in mixed awe and confusion')? And if Dumbledore didn't hear, one wonders why Snape didn't pass it on (especially given the disturbance in the Great Hall)?

Bring Tyls back is interesting. But isn't it a bit strange that Voldemort could bring him back with just a couple of spells but everyone else says that's impossible? And isn't Severus absolutely right? Does Dumbledore's answer work when he obviously knew Harry wasn't getting his letters in Book 1 (not only is there the multiple sendings, but Hagrid sends off a letter specifically to Dumbledore to let him know that Harry has received his letter)? Even if it is the case that Dumbledore paid special attention in Harry's case, why wouldn't he investigate the very odd appearance of Tyls (he should notice Tyls name is/was not down in the book, at the very least)?

Cool. I didn't like it quite as much as the others though. Ah well. Onto the next!

Phew! God, I've been in the edge of my seat! He's awake! yay! I hope Sev really is
okay . . .

Yay! he got a duster! Yay! I LOVE dusters! . . . Poor Niamh. How do you pronounce that anyway? NEE-AM?

Excuse me, but in Not Myself Year 5: A Rebirth and a Return, in Chapter 4: Arguments and the Times of Change, you were telling about the Weasley's clock and how it had gained 5 extra hands, instead of putting 1 Niamh and 1 Hermione, you accidentally put 2 Niamhs. By-the-by, my friend and both believe that you have written an excellent series in these. The Snape-is-Harry Potter's-father factor is a particularly excellent touch. I do believe that your stories are even better that the originals.

Year five down! ON TO SIX!

Perchance the cat is hungry and is gnawing Snape because she wants food?

Perfect and still more perfect

Lady Ravenclaw here:
The way Ginny, Harry, and Ron woke up Fred, George, and Bill was funny. Quite a bit of this chapter was humorous.
-Bye!

good

that chapter made no sence.well at least not to me