 maguena1 2004-12-09 . chapter 1First of all, let me say that I like your style of writing very much. You have good turns of phrase, and the humorous parts make me smile, like the conversations about retaining the evidence despite the court order.
And I also like how you've drawn Grissom's backstory - it seems plausible, and you've obviously put a lot of thought into considering the possible repercussions, like the bonding between those CSIs who have lost their fathers. Nonetheless, the way you've written about these things strikes me as needing some work.
The main thing that irritates me is the constant psychoanalysis that your characters engage in. I rather think that people who have known each other for a long time would not do that. I understand that it's an easy way to convey your insights - believe me, since I often do this myself, I understand how easy it is. But it's not really the best way to write about what's going on in characters' heads. It is better to let their words and actions convey those insights. You have a tendency to make sweeping statements, and have people speak in platitudes. I'm not saying that the characters would never speak like that, but in this story, they seem to talk like that excessively.
Let's take one example. You wrote: "Maybe you guys subconsciously think that Nick and I can't relate, since we grew up in intact families." You could have written something like "I even feel a bit excluded sometimes, seeing how close you guys are. I think maybe Nick feels the same way. And I wouldn't want to lose my father, just so you'd let me in, but still..." Another example - you wrote: "Gil, don't let him ruin the rest of your life. You very well may have 30 or 40 more years left. Or maybe just 30 or 40 hours. Either way, you can choose to live it to please yourself instead of him," You could have written something like "Gil, I know you. You've done a lot, and you still have time to do more. Who's he to say anything about what you do? He's not the one who's going to be affected by it." I know the examples I give are not all that good, but hopefully, they illustrate the difference between saying a thing and demonstrating it.
And the amazing thing is - no one is ever wrong in their analysis of other people's motives. No one is even slightly off, no one lets their own experience interfere with their understanding of other people's experience, and no one is anything less than absolutely certain that they've got the right insight. Where do I go to get that accurate? ;-)
Finally, the letter. My reaction to reading it was - "how utterly bland and generic." I think that a man writing a letter to his son to make up for years of neglect would get slightly more personal. Do something to prove that he _knew_ Grissom, because generally, that's how we know that people love us, by their understanding of us. He might have included a few memories that he hoped that Grissom retained of their time together, and tried to explain himself more while making it clearer that he didn't expect Grissom to understand him. E.g., "Do you remember how I used to take you to the zoo, and you always wanted to get in with the animals, and I'd have to keep telling you no, because you'd hurt them if you did that? I keep remembering that, now that I can't get close to you..." As it is, my reaction to Grissom elder's protestations is that he talks a good talk, but that he never actually cared. He went to the graduation, and that was somehow less suspicious than shaking off any pursuit for a few minutes and dropping a letter without a return address in the mailbox? I have started to dislike the man, and all the more because you work so hard to convince the readers that he was a good man, really. If I, to whom he never did anything because he doesn't exist, have such a hard time accepting his excuses, don't you think that Grissom would have much more of a struggle than you've written him as having?
Anyhow, I don't want to give you the wrong impression with all this criticism - I really do like your writing, and I feel like you have the potential to make it truly excellent with more practice. Just - think about the way that people around you actually talk, especially about deep issues, and try to convey that in your writing. Good luck. |