Help
Home Just In Communities Forums Beta Readers Search
Reviews for: Requiem for Ranma
Deshwitat03 5/5/11 . chapter 1
great and really sad but oddly fiting story, my respect
Rose1948 7/15/07 . chapter 1
Wow. Just... wow *speechless, awestruck*
claihm solais 3/8/05 . chapter 1
Wow...is all I can say. A truly touching and masterful piece of work you have here. It is definitely one of the best pieces I have seen so far, by far one of the most serious and depressing, but also emotional and powerful stories.

It is an interesting take on the whole Ranma story, written from a unique point of view, emotional in its own way, yet in a strange way, conveying a sense of a happy ending despite the depression.

I wish I could say "keep up the excellent work", but this seems like one of the few masterpieces that comes only every once in a blue moon. I can't restate often enough how powerful and touching this was.
E-chan 12/22/02 . chapter 1
Wow. This was so...incredible. This was really touching; I really enjoyed it. Poor Ranma! I love that guy...he shouldn't have died in such a sucky way.
Mecha Mummy 9/4/01 . chapter 1
... Wow. Just... wow. I'm depressed now. This is undoubtedly the best-written serious fic I have ever read at fanfiction.net.
Tsuki no Hikari 6/24/01 . chapter 1
Oh my God, that's so sad! Ya made me cry! geez... well anyway, ::wiping eyes:: it was really good! ::sniffle:: u should have a kleenex warning at the beginning tho! _;
LinaDuck 5/14/01 . chapter 1
...poor akane... ...sniff...
Dragon Trainer 5/11/01 . chapter 1
Awwwww, so sad! DRAAAAAT! GREAT JOB!
Nodoka 5/2/01 . chapter 1
Amazing. Absolutely amazing. I mean, WOW. Interesting point of view, and very well executed. You should be very proud of this.
edk 4/29/01 . chapter 1
not bad, up until the bit about the Tendos being Christian. Go look at the manga again, see how much Shinto beliefs and traditions were a natural part of their lives. The very traditionalism that provoked an arranged marriage would make Christianity very unlikely. Even Kasumi's cross is not necessarily indicative.
Return to Top