This is good; there were just a few minor errors. First, the Bible says that the slave's name was Malchus, not Levi. Second, Annas was just as bad as Caiaphas. Third, Annas probably would not have treated a slave like his son, because he had a replacement: his son-in-law Caiaphas. Finally, Pilate was very ruthless, and not likely to want to spare Jesus. (Who cares if he was innocent? He was just a provincial according to Pilate.) Aside from this, it was a pretty good story with a unique perspective.