Greetings. I am currently (as of July 2007) a 20 year old male, heterosexual, political science/history university student residing in Panama who, unfortunately, has too much time on his hands (read: too lazy to actually do his work at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs). I am not what most would call a H/G "shipper" in that I do not believe in the childish notion of upholding the sanctity of one -fictional- pairing over another, but I will admit that I do believe that Harry and Ginny are perfect for each other. My preferences are the following:
Favorite Character: Ginny Weasley (by far and large)
Least Favorite: Albus Dumbledore and Draco Malfoy (It's a tie between the the man who doesn't seem to comprehend what war is and the spoiled brat. NOTHING to do with Dumbles being gay!)
Favorite HP Book: Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (Ginny's big coming out!), Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows
Pet HP Peeve: Love as a weapon (Am I really the only one who sees that as not only a physical impossibility, but the most ridiculous, childish deus ex machina ever created? What's he going to do, hug him to death?) Post-DH Note: Was I right or what? So much for love--t'was a weapon that did ol' Voldy in!
Favorite Pairings:
Harry/Ginny
James/Lily
Remus/Tonks
Hated Pairings:
Ginny/Draco (Just...no)
Sirius/Lily (Not only is it a massive deviation from canon, but also disregards the Sirius-James friendship factor)
Any slash pairings involving Harry
And many, many more. (If I had to say every single one, this profile would go on forever)
Storytypes I Enjoy (but not limited to):
Grey!Ginny
Grey!Harry
Dark!Ginny (when it's still H/G)
Dark! Harry (When it's still H/G)
Technomancy!Harry/Ginny
Royalist!Harry
Independent!HarryTime
Travel!Harry/Ginny (I saw one with Ginny as the traveler which had a good deal of potential. Too bad it's discontinued)
Rich!Harry
Aristocrat!Harry/Ginny (A variant of the previous storytype, but one I enjoy nonetheless.)
Realist!Harry (or Ginny. She seems to be wiser than the hero at most times, it seems. In fact, Realist!Ginny is a good foil for that MHP!Harry, detailed below)
Storytypes I Hate:
Evil!Ginny (as well as selfish!, mean!, etc...I mean, really! What is your deal with bashing Ginny? There is no basis in canon to suggest any of these accusations!)
Pansy!Harry (as in, chronically depressed, keeps whining, and overall is just dislikeable)
Severitus!Harry (Ugh. Lily and Snape? Don't be ridiculous...short of rape, that is)
Evil!James&Lily (Hell.No)
Loveasaweapon!Harry (I'll say it again. Horrible, childish deus ex machina. You don't kill someone by loving, you kill them by AK'ing them.)
MoneyHemorrhagingPhilanthropic!Harry (Why doesn't someone smack him and educate him on sustainability? Doesn't he know people pay for food? What'll he do? Beg?)
New Pet Peeve: Overthetop!DeathEaters (And by this, I don't mean egos larger than Jupiter. I mean when the Death Eaters are portrayed as rampaging machines of rape, death, and mutilation. 2 deaths in a night is ok. Five towns worth of deaths? Not ok.)
New Pet Peeve: Idiot!Muggles (This goes hand in hand with the above storytype. How is it that the Muggle media machine, despite its real life tendency of finding out the truth, ends up swallowing some bogus story about a terrorist organization or a gas leak that just happened to strike some out-of-the-way series of towns? Like I said: 2 deaths? Explainable. 5 towns-worth of raped, mutilated bodies? Unless you're under full scale invasion by freakin' Tamerlane, there's no possible way that a terrorist organization did that.)
0o0o0o0o0o0o0
Sunday, January 13th, 2008, 05:15:04 PM
News flash!
Earlier today, this author received his first flame regarding the Dark Wars series! Needless to say, the author has commented on the matter, saying, "If you can't provide any criticism other than the fact that you, yourself are a childish, immature wanker with too much time on your hands, a chip on your shoulder, and a penchant for inane writing, then you're obviously not good enough for this story. Please hang yourself. Good day."
In other news, the world is still as screwed up today as it was yesterday.
Cheers,
Marquis Black
Tuesday, January 29, 2008, 12:58:55 PM
More news!
Marquis just received my second unnecessary review! In response, the author has said the following:
"Dear Mr. E Nigma. First off, let me say what a blatantly horrible signature you left behind. Secondly, in response to that...thing you call a review, I'd recommend the following: Stop writing in general, you twat. I could feel the blatant Americo-centrism from a mile away. Frankly, your kind disgusts me.
Also, in regards to the American colonies' rebellion, get your facts straight. The Insurrection occurred not because of any ideals of liberty or any of that ridiculous nonsense, but rather over taxes, and the middle-class' disregard towards their responsibility towards the Empire. The British, by ever legal standard, had every right to tax the American colonies in order to recoup their losses caused by the Seven Years' War, during which they heavily taxed their own citizens in order to finance the massive amount of supplies that were leaving British ports for American colonies in order to help the Americans win. Therefore, it was not "oppressive" or "cruel" to ask the colonists to assist in helping the British homeland to regain their financial losses, especially since they had just acquired land in India, and had opened up the Canadian lands to the English colonists in the American colonies. That they were unable to find it in themselves to be loyal, on the other hand, is a dark stain on the honour of every American rebel. That being said, they did fight admirably and with honour, for which I admire the soldiers of the Insurrection. Jefferson and his ilk, on the other hand...
Furthermore, there is no basis for your accusations of untoward arrogance from the soldiers towards the Hogwarts population. Only the Headmaster, Snape, and Draco have been treated less than politely, and each time, for previously given, and justified reasons.
Lesson of the day? Do not fuck with a man who's dedicated his life to the history of the British Empire. I will tear your arguments apart.
And, finally, as Max Reber once said: I am in the smallest room of the house. I have your review in front of me. Soon it will be behind me.
No love,
Marquis Black"
Cheers,
Marquis Black's assistant.
0o0o0o0o0o0o0
August 16th, 2008
Ok, so maybe it's time to make something spectacularly clear: There is criticism (which is valid), and then there is sheer idiocy (which is invalid and unwanted). The anonymous reviewer, "morgoth" has taken to writing the latter in his two reviews about the Dark Wars. Now, what's wrong with this picture? Let me point it out to you more clearly: he has seen fit to write a flame not once, but twice over a disparity of opinion between himself and I on the importance of the British Empire to history and mankind. Now, this isn't the first time I've had someone disagree with me--hell, some of my more loyal readers/reviewers disagree with me as well, but at least they have the decency and good sense not to make it into a vendetta; a lesson obviously lost on Mr. "morgoth" (By the way, using the Tolkien Overlord of Darkness as a penname isn't exactly the best way to settle your moral high ground.)
Now, for your reading pleasure, Mr. "morgoth"'s two reviews.
Submitted August 12th, approximately at 7:23 AM:
"Do you have some sort of disorder where you have to degrade the U.S. nearly every chance you get? I read some of your stories. Apart from the obvious lack of realism, it seems you rather enjoy making a mockery out of us. I don't care if you do it once in awhile; but, you have a habitual disorder with this. And apparently, I'm the only one who's not stupid enough to realize the ridiculousness of Harry obtaining a five-star rank in his 20's. You say you derive most of the military material from sources rather than first-hand experience. So, if you've really done your research you might see a problem with Harry as a Field Marshal. But who am I to you, right? I'm just another idiotic American like the one you visualize in your stereotypes."
So let's get down to the dissection. of this first one, before we head off to the second one, shall we? The first thing I'd like to point out is the first sentence of "morgoth"'s review. While I am personally unsure as to whether or not I have an actual clinical psychological disorder (i.e. as defined by a medical textbook), I assure you that my grudge against the United States (which played little role in the making of the antagonistic US Government portrayed in the story) is very much based on real life experience, and not some chemical imbalance in my brain. My own experiences growing up in a country literally split in half due to a US-controlled region shaped much of my opinions (and later grudges), even as, during a period of 2-3 years, I practically worshipped the United States as God's gift to mankind. The decision to make the US government an antagonist, however, simply stemmed from the theoretical question, "In an impossible situation of sink or swim, how low would the US sink to in order to swim?" Considering the catastrophic situations I've hinted at in other European countries (where Magical factions have pretty much taken over large swathes of land and forced civil wars), I cannot imagine why I should give the US any preferential treatment whatsoever.
Furthermore, regarding Harry's rank--I wouldn't be so quick to shout "how unreal" if you actually bothered to read a history book about events older than 200 years. Even before the United States was even a word in Jefferson's adled mind, great leaders had already risen that were half the age of most of the 5 star commanders of today. Alexander the Great was made regent at 18. Octavius was made Senator of the Roman Republic at age 19, at which point he was also awarded the right to vote alongside Consuls, as well as the power of Imperium, granting his command of armies. That same year, became part of a Triumvirate which controlled Rome, the world's mightiest superpower of its day. At age 29, T'sao T'sao, a warlord of the 3rd Century in China, was able to seize command of an army and help put down one of the most massive peasant rebellions of the age. At age 28, Genghis Khan had united a minor confederation of Mongol tribes already, paving the way for his future conquest of the largest contiguous Empire the world has ever known. So, given these examples, how is Harry's fast promotion anything unreal? The only people who cannot see how greatness paves its way up the ranks and into total power are those who cannot comprehend that level of skill--those who remain true to the idea that all men are mediocre fools. The era and year are irrelevant to the discussion, as great men often find ways to circumvent, or destroy, the restrictions that bind them.
Then, regarding my so-called "American stereotypes," how would you possibly know what they are? Are you psychic? Can you comprehend what I've lived through? Have you ever had to watch tanks and helicopters travel above and near your home? To see soldiers patrol the streets and hear that your government has been toppled just because the Americans didn't like the guy? Can your puny, egocentric, little mind even begin to comprehend what happens outside the United States? If not (and I expect not), then sit down, stay quiet, and find yourself some mediocre job, as you deserve. At least I'll be a better man by having risen above sheer hatred of the United States and actually befriending many of your more worthy compatriots.
But now, going onto your second review.
Submitted Today, at 7:36 PM:
"Wow, I read your profile and it seems you're obsessed with British history- especially on its Empire. What I gather is that you're just an ethnocentric, jingoistic Imperialist. Have you forgotten the suffering of the Africans, Indians, and Chinese for the sake of "progress of the Empire". What gives one person to proclaim dominance over another and demand loyalty? NOTHING!"
Again with the insults. Let's go bit by bit again, shall we?
Obsessed with British History -- of course I am. Why shouldn't I be? Because revisionist morons tell me they were big and bad and evil? (The lack of grammar there was intention, by the by) Please. Anyone who can't respect a nation who's history spans more than 1,000 years of history is a fool. Those who then dismiss it because it made the "mistake" of being an Empire are absolute morons. Compared to the US, the British seem to have done a better job at...well...everything.
As for what the Empire gave mankind...well, let's see...there's the railways, modern democracy, the concept of professional armies, the idea of a professional Western-style bureaucracy, almost every important nautical innovation, the radar, modern science and mathematics, philosophers to suit your ever need and want in life, modern battlefield medecine, the concept of natural rights (a mistake, in my mind), modern capitalism, and so forth. Shall I go on?
And before we go into the "horrible" oppression of the Africans, Chinese, and Indians, let's not forget who the United States has made into their equivalent to the aforementioned peoples: namely, my people--the Latinos. Oh, and the African-Americans, of course. And the Japanese, during World War II, the Chinese during the railway era, the Native Americans (ah, Sherman, you crazy man, you), the Mexicans, the Philippinos, the Cubans, and so on. But, of course, according to you, the US can do no wrong! It is a bastion of liberty, even as the Patriot Act is enabled! Even as you enable espionage laws that even your most anti-Bush candidate voted in favour of (not naming any names, but a hint says his family name starts with O)! Oh yes, the US has a very pretty history of abiding to humanitarian principles (not).
Oh, and then there's my personal favourite people that the US oppressed--your own. Remember the 70,000 Loyalists the US had virtually exiled following the Revolution? What was their crime, again? Oh, right--desiring to remain loyal to King George. Oh dear; now that just won't do, now will it? By the way, if you ever see the mini-series biopic of John Adams on HBO, remember to look closely in the first episode what they do to the Crown Official. How that is worth of any pride is beyond me. If you find that worthy of praise, you disgust me.
Now then, reaching the last, final insult--being an ethnocentrist, jingoistic Imperialist. Actually, it's not really the last--it was actually the first one delivered, but I saved it for last. In any case, let me remind you of one thing: I'm Latino, you idiot. If I were ethnocentrist, the British would be second-class citizens, the Americans would have no redeemable feature (and they do, since I've mentioned the American Resistance), and Latin Americans would manipulate the world like puppetmasters from bad spy movies. Instead, we have the Central American Latinos band together into a neutral country, while the Southern American Latinos are split between being allies to the Death Eaters or the Empire.
Imperialist, on the other hand, I can proudly say I am. I believe in the inevitable unification of the planet's many countries under one power, but whether or not that power is Britain or someone else is unknown to me, though I'll be personally rooting for Latin America or the British. Hell, maybe even the Russians. Regarding jingoism, as a witness to war, I can say I dislike it very much. However, there are situations that naturally call for force of arms, and I aim to show my readers in the Dark Wars series one such situation.
Now then, unless you're willing to submit an apology, never again darken my life with your rambling idiocies.
Marquis Black
0o0o0o0o0o0o0
The World at War Series: A concept that arose in my mind after reading many "Final Battle" and beyond stories. I guess after reading too many fairytale-ish stories where Harry basically invokes a deus ex machina to defeat Voldemort (secret amulet, sudden powers, some massive weapon hidden in Hogwarts no one has ever heard about, what have you) and then due to Voldemort kicking the bucket all Death Eaters either die or surrender from the backlash, I just got tired of the repetition and decided to make a more...realistic world, where the war against Voldie isn't just long, but gruesome and hard fought. Where men and women are tried by chaos and horror and either succumb to it or rise above it.
Note that the WaW series relies heavily on technomancy, as it is my personal belief that between a wizard and a sniper two miles away, the sniper would come out victorious. Based on that knowledge, I have Harry, or some companion to Harry, or an entire Muggle-Wizard thinktank produce Techno-Magic hybrids. Now, most will challenge the way my series works because it always seems as if either side has an advantage for most of the story, but the truth is that technology does that to a war. But fear not, the scales tend to readjust themselves. As it's been said, "We used semi-automatics, so they got automatics. We used body armor, so they got armor-piercing rounds."
One thing that my stories have in common is their basic premise: War is hell. Enjoy.
Warning: I will not deign myself to reply or tolerate flames made on the basis of "shipping" or made along the lines of "YOU SUCK, GO KILL YOURSELF!" Any review I do not deem as constructive criticism will be subsequently deleted. If you really don't like my story, I'm fine with that, but at least tell me why without being an insulting child.
Furthermore, I do not write "bash" stories. While it may seem like it at times (such as in Beginning of the Dark Wars), everything I've written is made with cold, calculated logic. Some of my stories may have Dumbledore "bashing", as most of you would describe it, but I do not consider it as such. The man is portrayed as manipulative, yes, but he's not evil, or mentally challenged-he's just misguided.
Lastly, to deter any questions or slanderous comments on my parentage and/or nationality, let me be clear that my parents were very much married when they had me, and that I'm Panamanian (as in Republic of Panama; not Panama City, Florida. If any of you so much as imply that in a review, I'll delete it).
0o0o0o0o0o0o0
Military Background: As I've noted before, I've never claimed to understand the full extent of the horrible plight of a soldier in wartime. That being said, I believe it is necessary for me to expound exactly how I know what I know.
1. I've never been in an Armed Service.
2. Neither of my parents served in an Armed Service.
3. Only one of my grandfathers served in an Armed Service, but never in combat.
4. Self-taught knowledge on military history makes up 99.9 percent of my military knowledge--terminology and facts included.
5. 100 percent self-taught knowledge on military tactics.
6. History buff.
0o0o0o0o0o0o0
Story Notes:
Original Characters:
- Joachim Blackthorne: Aide-de-camps for Harry on occasion, as well as one of the Potter Family's spies and operatives. Appearances: The Dark Wars: Empire's Plight, The Dark Wars: Empire's End
- Lord Victor Irons: Field Marshall of the Imperial Army and Head of the Imperial Armed Forces. Appearances: The Dark Wars: Empire's End.
- Richard Sharpe: Major in the 96th Imperial Rifles Regiment. Part of Harry Potter's task force. Appearances: The Dark Wars: Empire's Plight, The Dark Wars: Empire's End.
- John Wolfe: Major in the 79th Imperial Highlander Regiment. Part of Harry Potter's task force. Appearances: The Dark Wars: Empire's Plight, The Dark Wars: Empire's End.
- George C. Tarleton: Secretary of State for Defense of the British Government. Descended from Banastre Tarleton. Appearances: The Dark Wars: Empire's Plight (mentioned only)
- Jeremy Monck: Captain in the Imperial Navy, Northern Squadron detachment. Assigned to Harry Potter's Royal Northern Army. Appearances: The Dark Wars: Empire's Plight.
- Jon MacAllen: Captain in the 79th Imperial Highlander Regiment. Appearances: The Dark Wars: Empire's Plight.
- Jan Lyles: Captain in the 96th Imperial Rifles Regiment. Appearances: The Dark Wars: Empire's Plight.
- Zachary Allen: Major in the 108th Imperial Artillery Regiment. Appearances: The Dark Wars: Empire's Plight.
- The Council: A group of unspecified Death Eaters who control and direct the Death Eater Organization in the absence of Voldemort. Appearances: The Dark Wars: Empire's Plight (mentioned only), The Dark Wars: Empire's End (mentioned only)
Original Groups:
- 96th Imperial Highlander Regiment
- 79th Imperial Highlander Regiment
- 108th Imperial Artillery Regiment
- 45th Imperial Cavalry Regiment
- Royal Naval Northern Squadron
- 12th Imperial Shielder Regiment (only in name. True strength less than 1,500)
- Imperial Council
- Imperial Government of Canada
- Imperial Government of the Falklands
- Imperial Government of the Isles of Man and Jersey
- Imperial Government of Australia
- Imperial Government of Ascension Isle
- Imperial Government of New Zealand
- Imperial Government of Ireland
- Imperial Government of England
- Imperial Government of Scotland
- Imperial Government of Wales
0o0o0o0o0o0o0
Favorite Story (That I've written): Oddly enough, despite the fact that I take great pride in my Dark Wars series, I find that my own, personal favorite is actually my one-shot entitled "Remember." I find it to be my greatest achievement yet in portraying the emotional side of the "left-behind"--rather, the emotional side of anyone, period, with a certain degree of credibility. Even in the Dark Wars series, I'll fall into the trap of making the characters too two-dimensional, without adding any depth. In Remember, however, while I do focus on the feeling of love, I've also brought out lust, longing, sadness, joy, and numerous other feelings. Basically, everything I could rack my head through in terms of emotions.
It also helps that it's ship-less, in that no one character is ever mentioned. Hell, for all you know, that could be Cho Chang talking about Michael Corner. Or Hermione about Ron. It's really all up to you.
0o0o0o0o0o0o0
Politics of the World in WaW: Despite what initial impressions may show, one must be very careful when claiming to understand the politics behind the world I've created. While it may seem that the Potters and any other Royalist magical family are posing (falsely) as Muggle aristocrats before the events of DW:EP, this is not true. The Queen has always known of the loyalist families' magical abilities, and the Potters weren't one originally. In fact, they became loyalists after escaping the events of October 31st, 1981. The Potters fled to other holdings of the Empire and there became members of the Imperial military, before then becoming part of the Imperial government. By 1997, the Potters had achieved a respected status in both the military and government (Matthew became known for his oratory skill, Alexandra had worked for the military R&D, James had become governor of the Falklands, and Lily was well known as a promoter for greater intellectualism and equal rights). Thanks to their achievements, they were inducted into the nobility in 1995, gaining the titles of Marquess and Marchioness for James and Lily, respectively. However, since Matthew and Alexandra are adopted children, Harry is the one inheriting the title of Marquess, while Ginny will gain the title of Marchioness upon the deaths of James and Lily. As such, the Potters were not, indeed, posing as Muggle aristocrats before 1997, but rather were known, loyal servants who were -made- into aristocrats thanks to their achievements.
Also, inasmuch as the Crown's relation to the magical world is concerned, it has not, in fact, been strained forever. Indeed, up until the death of Victoria, the magical world had acquiesced the Crown as its legal sovereign (even if the Crown's power was still kept under wraps by the Magical purebloods). However, upon the death of the much beloved Queen in the early 1900s, the purebloods took advantage of her death by slowly directing the Ministry to greater and greater independence from the Crown who, seeing the numerous problems in the Muggle world, allowed it, even if reluctantly. However, no legal break had been written down and, as such, the Crown had every right to order the Ministry to harden their stance against Death Eaters in the years leading up to 1997. Which is why, after having been ignored for too long, the Crown furiously ordered the army to take action, which is when the standing army that is shown in DW:EP was assembled.
The reader must understand that up to 1996, approximately, the Imperial Army was just made up of maybe 2,000-4,000 men and women who were supposed to be peacekeepers. When the magical world became unruly, however, large amounts of men from the Muggle Armed Forces were transferred to Imperial control. The project that will be mentioned in the sequel of DW:EP has, as such, been a proposal that's been around since well before Harry was even born.
0o0o0o0o0o0o0
Country Profiles (As of Empire's War):
- India - Independent
- Japanese Empire - Allied to the Empire
- United States of America - Officially allied to the Death Eaters (Unofficially, torn apart by civil war between the Resistance and the Federal Government)
- People's Republic of China - Neutral (Terminated their Magical uprising more quickly than any other nation)
- Latin America/South America - Split between the Confederation of Free Latin Countries (Neutral, anti-Federation), and the Federation of Enlightened Countries (anti-Confederate, pro-Death Eater)
- Europe - Torn apart between Death Eater-supportive enclaves and supporters of integrational policies. In a state of total war.
- Russian Federation - Neutral (Terminated their Magical uprising as well; however, many wizards there flee to support Death Eaters)
- Africa - Imperial Control: 30; Independent: 15; Disputed/No Man's Land: 10; Death Eaters: 45)
- Oceania (Minus Australia and New Zealand) - Neutral
0o0o0o0o0o0o0
Disclaimers: I own nothing other than my OCs and the plot.
Also, in regards to the ownership of Richard Sharpe, I fully agree, and even uphold, that Bernard Cornwell is the legal owner of the 19th Century British soldier, Richard Sharpe, of the King's 95th Rifles. The Richard Sharpe of this story, though, is both in the modern era, in a different regiment, and holds a different attitude altogether than the British hero created by Bernard Cornwell, who is, incidentally, one of my favorite authors. The only similarities both men have is the name and being a Rifleman.
Note: BotDW is being edited, thus explaining the sudden halt in updates. Its sequel is also going through such a revision.
0o0o0o0o0o0o0
Marquis Black's Recommended Reads:
(Star Ratings go up to 5)
This Means War! by Jeconais (Action/Adventure-Comedy) 5 Stars
Summary: When the Weasley Boys interfere in Ginny's relationship with Dean, they make the biggest mistake of their lives. The witch decides that revenge is in order, and her first point of call is a new boyfriend - Harry.
Snape's Worst Nightmare by Draco664 (Comedy) 5 Stars
Summary: What is Professor Snape's worst nightmare? Why, teaching the next generation of Potters and Weasleys!
Harry Potter and the Correcting of Past Mistakes by thejadefalcon (Angst-Comedy-Action/Adventure) 4 Stars (Sorry, my friend, but there are some problems with it)
Summary: Five years after Dumbledore died Voldemort has won the war. Harry grabs a Time Turner and vows to change it all. He takes his younger self away before the Dursleys wake up. How will this change the outcome of the war?
Harry Potter and the Twists of Fate by benperez31 (Comedy-Action/Adventure-Romance) 4.5 Stars
Summary: Harry's parents didn't die that Halloween night, they even had a daughter just after going into hiding, and the Weasleys took care of Harry and his sister after the attack by Voldemort. Now what?
Harry Potter and the Nightmares of Futures Past by Viridian (Angst-Action/Adventure-Romance?) 5 Stars (Though update lags make it somewhat dreary...)
Summary: The war is over. Too bad no one is left to celebrate. Harry makes a desperate plan to go back in time, even though it means returning Voldemort to life. Now an 11 year old Harry with 30 year old memories is starting Hogwarts. Can he get it right?
Breaking the News by dress-without-sleeves (Comedy) (Cracks me up every time) 5 Stars
Summary: ARE THOSE HANDCUFFS, HARRY POTTER? (Marquis' Note: I'm serious. That's what the summary is)
0o0o0o0o0o0o0
Marquis' Views
A thought crossed Marquis' mind the other day, which he told me about, and I agreed. In light of the heavy pro-Monarchic sentiment being shown in his writing, he thought it best to come clean and state what his exact views were. That being said, he went through the entire story to look for the quote he thought illustrated these views best. After about an hour of scouring, he finally found it. The following is from Empire's Rebirth.
“It is the times, Harry,” Sulu spoke softly. “Honour, duty, and Empire no longer go with the times.”
“That’s bullshit, and you know it!” spat Harry. “It’s no longer with the times if we refuse to make it be with the times! Republics, democracies, tyrannies—these have always existed, so why can’t the Empire?”
As you can see, Marquis is extremely pro-monarchy. As a matter of fact, he'd like to point out that he was recently asked to participate in a pro-Monarchic column. In addition, he has sent several letters to pro-Monarchy groups around the globe, urging them to take a more aggressive stance against what he has called, and I quote, "the vile and virulent disease that is republicanism."
Cheers,
The Little Duke (Marquis' Assistant)
Contact Information:
YIM: the_black_marquis
AIM: IBVeteran2006
MSN: yami_satoshi86@hotmail.com
FanFiction.Net - unleash your imagination
Canada