Well sense this is my Bio I should tell you about my self, though I can't think why you would want to know.

Name: A secret.

Screen name: Grey Field (Don't ask why, I'm not entirely sure)

Nick names: Anti-Jack

Age: Some where in-between 1 and 100 years old... I lost track.

Gender: male or female... probably

Occupation: Irrelevant

Status: Mildly Eccentric

Location: under 1 light year away strait ahead, there my be a 180 degree margin of error.

Religion: Devout Agnostic

Things I like: Skiing, most video games, dramatics (but not drama), Brain Teasers, maniacal laughter, villainous rants, humor, irony, twisting the truth, and Awesome (as in awe inspiring) stuff.

Things I don't like: I don't even know where to start.

Some of my bad qualities: annoying, impatient, shy, a bit violent, greedy, can be cocky, almost no empathy, plenty of apathy, slightly hypocritical, extremely blunt most of the time, just rude, and so uncaring of all my bad problems that I can calmly list them and not try to improve at all.

All of my good qualities: A bit of a honor code (though its not the same as most are use to), I like challenges, I'll let most things slide, but when push turns to shove I'm on it, Loyal, and that's really it (And it took along time to come up with that list).

About me as a fan writer or what ever we are suppose to call our selves.

I am a slow writer. I have a hard time getting myself to stick to one task long so updates are sporadic at the best of times. On top of this I'm dyslexic so my stories will usually be riddled with errors (mostly of the Rouge Angles Of Satin variety), so if you spot one just point it out and I'll happily correct it.

I mostly write humor, even when I'm trying to convey a moral idea. It is my personal opinion that there are three ways of being deep. The up front way (usual dark or no nonsense) is the easiest, because you can present the idea directly, but people can get offended and will spend less time thinking about it. Then there is the cryptic guru style, which will force the reader to think it over, but they also might just wave it off as hogwash. The final way is comical, this has the advantage that it will rarely offend, but the reader might not realize the idea behind it. When I'm writing something with a moral idea I aim for a mix of the three, not that it matters sense most of my stories are mindless fun.

Unlike most on this site, I rarely write romance. The only exception is 'To Love the Chess King' and I doubt that there will be any others. I just don't really feel inspired when writing romance, probably because of my lack of experience in that field. On the other hand I know the force of friendship and family very well. I have had friends of both genders, and there are a few I would take a bullet for (though I hope they never know that because I am not telling them, so they'd have to be shot at to find out and that would not be a pleasant experience for all parties involved). With this in mind I mostly right about friends, some times who could be on the verge of a romantic relationship. So it's safe to say that the closest I'll ever get to timeless romance is that awkward embarrassing stage and the 'oh my deity now he/she thinks I'm a total git' mentality.

About Fiction posted on this account

Another Annoying Death: just a dumb, funny poem.

Tavern Tales: Inebriated humor is always fun!

A Vision of the Future: Inspired by the similarities between Sokka and Iroh, and the repeating nature of history, that and the idea tickled me so.

To Love the Chess King: My first (and probably last) dive into romance and the Harry Potter section.