Author has written 8 stories for Harry Potter, and Percy Jackson and the Olympians.
hi everyone I am a person and am a percy Jackson & harry potter fan4life!!!!
I USED TO BE glitch-e-r-749
I ship percy/artemis and some percy/zoe
I also ship daphne/harry and fleur/harry though it is pretty weird as no one really knows her well but...
follow me :)
now onto what i'm pretty sure are some of the MAJOR FLAWS OF THE CHARACTERS in hp. the story is perfect: ps: I only hate.no strongly dislike molly and ginny the rest is just not so constructive criticism. hehehe. AND I MEAN MAJOR FLAWS IN THE CHARACTERS LIKE IF THEY WERE REAL. IN THE STORY, THEY ARE MADE THAT WAY FOR A REASON AND IT IS AMAZING.
1. ginny & harry. no. just no. they are NOT GOOD TOGETHER. I mean come on she only dated other guys to make harry jealous. fangirl much?!!
2.molly weasley. i'll just go in points:
-she asked "oh where's the platform?" hello. she went to the school, took what 5,6 children and still didn't know?
- "packed with muggles of course" statue of secrecy ring a bell??
-she is not harry's frickin' mother! he went through so much before he even knew she existed!
-get over it. james is dead. now I don't hate snape, just molly and ginny, but this is pretty stupid.
-by favouring the slytherins you're getting the rest of the school to hate them more
-if you're so paranoid, how'd you get hit and polyjuiced for a whole. frickin'. year??? constant vigilance much.
-I am just wondering why you keep listening to everything Dumbledore says. I mean he's only human and plus you didn't help harry when he was young. harry is your cub...
-you need to find something you can do. pitying yourself can't help you.
-you are battling your evil cousin whom you hate and want to kill (or permenantly incapitate mind my spelling pls) but you stand there and frickin' laugh.
-you are the lord black. pushover much? (not that much but still). you deserve a trial. use your power to get one.
- 'when you have an edge, use it'
- slytherin DOES NOT = bad guy
-nice but stupid. my only comment
-look you're smart. first time you didn't believe harry, I won't blame you that much but second year only fred and George stood up for harry when everyone hated him. ron and Hermione were the only others to help.
-4th year turn another blind eye and let harry get verbally and emotionally abused.
-5th year. sure let's just tell him to keep his head down when only a few people believe him and there's a sadistic b*tch cutting open people's hand
-not helping him at the dursley's. If those muggles were that bad shouldn't you have gone and checked up on him.
-4th year you didn't stand up for harry. other than that you're awesome
-bit of a pushover.
-acts a bit stuck up in the start of the tournament
-a bit shy
14. most of Gryffindor house
-house loyalty much? leave one of your own to the wolves. hate harry in one moment but he's your saviour the next. stuck up b*tards.
15. most of Hogwarts
-goats and sheep, the lot of you.
- jealous prat. didn't it occur to that harry didn't want to be famous. or that he would trade every galleon he had for a family like yours? thought not.
-you can know a lot but you don't have to make everyone around you feel inferior to you. you just need to chill a bit bit that's only for start of 1st yr
18. Dumbledore (this is going to be long)
-leaving harry with the dursleys
-oh yes, brilliant idea, let's lure the wraith of voldemort possessing a human to the school with a priceless artefact which DOESN'T EVEN BELONG TO YOU.
-ever heard to a ward to keep people out? notice-me-not charm? no? well then how are you supposedly the greatest wizard of all time?
-sure, tell the whole bloody school full of impulsive teenagers not to go to the third floor corridors if they don't want to die. they'll never visit there!
-put a ceberus at the first step that can KILL students!
-oh yes, put the mirror of erased for a first year to be lured to see. at least ron had a bit of common sense with this one.
-stalker much. you watch harry look in the mirror...
-go out then have a feeling and come back just in time to save harry. coincidence much
-not nswering harry's questions. you said in the 5th book that you knew harry's childhood would be difficult then how would he have one in the first place so how would you leave him to have a childhood and not even prepare him to stop voldemort?!
-the traps are so hard that 3 FIRST YEARS can beat them. ha-bloody-ha
-look it happened 50 years ago, the signs are the same, you have a phoenix that can flame you anywhere and you sill can't find the chamber of secrets?!
-talk to myrtle maybe?
-are you like sick or something? you're just testing harry all this time!
-you put soul-sucking dementors at the school full of children . no, you allowed soul-sucking demons to be put in a school full of dementors??
-you didn't let Sirius black have a trial. you had the power to give him one but you didn't. chief of wizenggamot strikes again! not.
-you again at the end of year could have gone yourself, and stopped the dementors. what if harry hadn't learned to do the patronus charm? both would be dead.
-there are so many ways to get past a simple age line. summoning the pedestal. levitating the paper over the line, using a house-elf or an older student...
-why didn't you save harry from getting out. of the dursleys. maybe this one is a bit stupid but still.
-your so-called long-time friend had been polyjuiced and you couldn't tell.
-you didn't help harry from getting scorned by his peers.
-you didn't help him with the 3 tasks
-you let the cup be turned to a portkey
-you couldn't tell at all where harry went?
-dementors come and your so-called blood wards didn't do anything.
-you didn't look at harry at all or tell him why
-you let, ordered more like snape to rip his mind apart and make the visions worse.
-you didn't care when student's had their hand torn open even though you said that the students care was your first priority.
-you almost let harry be crucioed by umbit-umbridge
-you let Sirius die
-harry nearly got killed by voldemort and you arrived just in time to save him. again, coincidence much
-oh right, just after harry's godfather, the closest link to his parents, no offense remus, died, you then tell him about the prophecy and promise to tell him everything. which you did not btw .
-you tell harry about the horcruxes but didn't bother checking yourself. I mean harry saw slytherin's locket...
-you let dung steal from the blacks.
-you didn't tell harry about the scar
-you didn't remove the scar.
-you let snape handle malfoy knowing he didn't do anything nearly got the whole of Hogwarts killed and got yourself killed.
-stupid hallows. you had to follow it and get the curse
-you knew harry had a horcrux in him. what about suggesting pouring PHEONIX TEARS from the PHEONIX you are bonded to???? oh no, letting harry sacrifice himself is such a better option. or maybe asking harry to use basilisk venom...from the one he killed and you did not.
-you're dead so i'm done.
19. gryffindors, hufflepuffs and ravenclaws
-you are so bloody prejudiced against slyhterins.
-you don't let slytherins be with the light, so they go the the dark, their only option left and become jr. death munchers and then you are worse to them. idiots
-school loyalty much! you turn on harry one second then love him the next. wow, just wow
-you let everyone push you around
-you listened to everything everyone said
-you took the 2 easiest electives and the others could have helped you get a job or kill voldemort
-you refused to learn unless you can be killed, like the tournament,
-you let others dictate your life
-you believe too much in dumbledore
- I would never have forgiven the school for all they did. i'd have transferred or something.
okay I know that these were all intentional and THEY ARE NOT FLAWS IN THE STORY simply my opinion on the characters. I LOVE HP JUST THE WAY IT IS!!!!!!
On a completely different note, this passage thingy is cool:
An atheist professor of philosophy asks one of his new students to stand.
"You're a Christian, aren't you, son?"
"Yes, sir," the student says.
"So you believe in God?"
"Is God good?"
"Sure! God's good."
"Is God all-powerful? Can God do anything?"
Now the professor asks, "Are you good or evil?"
"The Bible says I'm evil," replies the student.
The professor grins knowingly.
"Aha! The Bible!" He considers for a moment. "Here's one for you. Let's say there's a sick person over here and you can cure him. You can do it. Would you help him? Would you try?"
"Yes, sir, I would."
"So you're good…!"
"I wouldn't say that."
"But why not say that? You'd help a sick and maimed person if you could. Most of us would if we could. But God doesn't."
The student does not answer, so the professor continues. "He doesn't, does he? My brother was a Christian who died of cancer, even though he prayed to Jesus to heal him. How is this Jesus good? Hmmm? Can you answer that one?"
The student remains silent.
"No, you can't, can you?" the professor says. He takes a sip of water from a glass on his desk to give the student time to relax.
"Let's start again, young fella. Is God good?"
"Er… yes," the student says.
"Is Satan good?"
The student doesn't hesitate on this one. "No."
"Then where does Satan come from?"
The student falters. "From God," he answers after a few moments.
"That's right. God made Satan, didn't he? Tell me, son. Is there evil in this world?"
"Evil's everywhere, isn't it? And God did make everything, correct?"
"So who created evil?" The professor continued, "If God created everything, then God created evil, since evil exists, and according to the principle that our works define who we are, then God is evil."
Again, the student has no answer. "Is there sickness? Immorality? Hatred? Ugliness? All these terrible things, do they exist in this world?"
The student squirms on his feet. "Yes."
"So who created them?"
The student does not answer again, so the professor repeats his question. "Who created them?" There is still no answer. Suddenly the lecturer breaks away to pace in front of the classroom. The class is mesmerized. "Tell me," he continues onto another student. "Do you believe in Jesus Christ, son?"
The student's voice betrays him and cracks. "Yes, professor, I do."
The old man stops pacing. "Science says you have five senses you use to identify and observe the world around you. Have you ever seen Jesus?"
"No, sir. I've never seen Him."
"Then tell us if you've ever heard your Jesus?"
"No, sir, I have not."
"Have you ever felt your Jesus, tasted your Jesus or smelt your Jesus? Have you ever had any sensory perception of Jesus Christ, or God for that matter?"
"No, sir, I'm afraid I haven't."
"Yet you still believe in him?"
"According to the rules of empirical, testable, demonstrable protocol, science says your God doesn't exist. What do you say to that, son?"
"Nothing," the student replies. "I only have my faith."
"Yes, faith," the professor repeats. "And that is the problem science has with God. There is no evidence, only faith."
The student stands quietly for a moment, before asking a question of his own. "Professor, is there such thing as heat?"
"Yes," the professor replies. "There's heat."
"And is there such a thing as cold?"
"Yes, son, there's cold too."
"No, sir, there isn't."
The professor turns to face the student, obviously interested. The room suddenly becomes very quiet. The student begins to explain. "You can have lots of heat, even more heat, super-heat, mega-heat, unlimited heat, white heat, a little heat or no heat, but we don't have anything called 'cold'. We can hit up to 458 degrees below zero, which is no heat, but we can't go any further after that. There is no such thing as cold; otherwise we would be able to go colder than the lowest, minus 458 degrees.
"Every body or object is susceptible to study when it has or transmits energy, and heat is what makes a body or matter have or transmit energy. Absolute zero (-458 F) is the total absence of heat. You see, sir, cold is only a word we use to describe the absence of heat. We cannot measure cold. Heat we can measure in thermal units because heat is energy. Cold is not the opposite of heat, sir, just the absence of it."
Silence across the room. A pen drops somewhere in the classroom, sounding like a hammer.
"What about darkness, professor? Is there such a thing as darkness?"
"Yes," the professor replies without hesitation. "What is night if it isn't darkness?"
"You're wrong again, sir. Darkness is not something; it is the absence of something. You can have low light, normal light, bright light, flashing light, but if you have no light constantly you have nothing and it's called darkness, isn't it? That's the meaning we use to define the word.
"In reality, darkness isn't. If it were, you would be able to make darkness darker, wouldn't you?"
The professor begins to smile at the student in front of him. This will be a good semester. "So what point are you making, young man?"
"Yes, professor. My point is, your philosophical premise is flawed to start with, and so your conclusion must also be flawed."
The professor's face cannot hide his surprise this time. "Flawed? Can you explain how?"
"You are working on the premise of duality," the student explains. "You argue that there is life and then there's death; a good God and a bad God. You are viewing the concept of God as something finite, something we can measure.
"Sir, science can't explain a thought. It uses electricity and magnetism, but has never seen, much less fully understood either one. To view death as the opposite of life is to be ignorant of the fact that death cannot exist as a substantive thing. Death is not the opposite of life, just the absence of it.
"Now tell me, professor. Do you teach your students that they evolved from monkeys?"
"If you are referring to the natural evolutionary process, young man, yes, of course I do."
"Have you ever observed evolution with your own eyes, sir?"
The professor begins to shake his head, still smiling, as he realizes where the argument is going. A very good semester, indeed.
"Since no one has ever observed the process of evolution at work and cannot even prove that this process is an ongoing endeavour, are you not teaching your opinion, sir? Are you now not a scientist, but a preacher?"
The class is in uproar. The student remains silent until the commotion has subsided.
"To continue the point you were making earlier to the other student, let me give you an example of what I mean."
The student looks around the room. "Is there anyone in the class who has ever seen the professor's brain?" The class breaks out into laughter.
"Is there anyone here who has ever heard the professor's brain, felt the professor's brain, touched or smelt the professor's brain? No one appears to have done so. So, according to the established rules of empirical, stable, demonstrable protocol, science says that you have no brain, with all due respect, sir.
"So if science says you have no brain, how can we trust your lectures, sir?"
Now the room is silent. The professor just stares at the student, his face unreadable.
Finally, after what seems an eternity, the old man answers. "I guess you'll have to take them on faith."
"Now, you accept that there is faith, and in fact, faith exists with life," the student continues. "Now, sir, is there such a thing as evil?"
Now uncertain, the professor responds, "Of course, there is. We see it every day. It is in the daily example of man's inhumanity to man. It is in the multitude of crime and violence everywhere in the world. These manifestations are nothing else but evil."
To this the student replied, "Evil does not exist, sir, or at least it does not exist unto itself. Evil is simply the absence of God. It is just like darkness and cold, a word that man has created to describe the absence of God. God did not create evil. Evil is the result of what happens when man does not have God's love present in his heart. It's like the cold that comes when there is no heat or the darkness that comes when there is no light."
The professor sat down.
FAKE FRIENDS: Never ask for food.