Author has written 14 stories for Naruto, Elder Scroll series, Harry Potter, Inuyasha, and Lord of the Rings.
Hi, I'm Alalaes (
Discovered fanfiction mid-high school and never looked back. I'm a multi-fandom lover and can usually find good reading anywhere ... I have to admit, I love reading most of all, but sometimes I use a keyboard to write stuff.
In defence of what we do
I have never felt the need to hide my enthusiasm for writing fanfic. I freely confess to all and sundry that it is the favorite of my many hobbies. Fanfic fills a creative void in a way entirely different than needlework or calligraphy or painting or sculpture. It is a satisfaction of a singular sort.
“What nobody tells people who are beginners — and I really wish someone had told this to me . . . is that all of us who do creative work, we get into it because we have good taste. But there is this gap. For the first couple years you make stuff, and it’s just not that good. It’s trying to be good, it has potential, but it’s not.
But your taste, the thing that got you into the game, is still killer. And your taste is why your work disappoints you. A lot of people never get past this phase. They quit. Most people I know who do interesting, creative work went through years of this. We know our work doesn’t have this special thing that we want it to have. We all go through this. And if you are just starting out or you are still in this phase, you gotta know it’s normal and the most important thing you can do is do a lot of work. Put yourself on a deadline so that every week you will finish one story.
It is only by going through a volume of work that you will close that gap, and your work will be as good as your ambitions. And I took longer to figure out how to do this than anyone I’ve ever met. It’s gonna take awhile. It’s normal to take awhile. You’ve just gotta fight your way through.”
— Ira Glass
They're a symptom not a disease. Sigridhr (AO3) makes some valid points in her essay:
Canon Original Characters (ie. OCs)
Canonicity is a touchy subject among fans. To what extent are writers allowed to creatively play with the characters? How faithful should a fanfic be to canon? Are alternative-universe fics (AUs) automatic no-nos?
People will always have different interpretations of characters according to their own experience - especially if the canon material does not provide a lot of detail.
A canon character's story is usually a closed book by the time the story ends ... but the world just keeps going, and you never learn everything about it, so there's always room for more. To me, the world of the fandom is the most important character, and is the one I always want to read more about. I don't care about Harry Potter. I care about Hogwarts. I don't care about Frodo, I care about Middle Earth. I don't care about Luke Skywalker, I care about that galaxy far, far away. I want to see stories that develop the world, give it more history, flesh out its current nature and problems, and move its development forwards in interesting ways.
I think the whole original character thing depends on how well written the story is overall. I'll trust a good writer over any pairing, plot, universe, or character -- whether original or canon. If the writing is bad, it doesn't matter if the original character is in the lead, or in support. A good writer makes you know, believe in, and understand the original character as well as the canon characters. They blend the original characters into the story so well, you wonder why the canon author forgot them.
The absence of a comment does not mean the writing is good, all it means is that no one has noticed or has bothered to comment on the mistake. But I try and give the reviews I like to have. If I've goofed, if there are errors in my story, I'd like to know about it. I assume all the other authors here want to write better. The first step towards better writing is to know when you screw up. But if you say things like 'Don't like, don't read' or send abusive PMs back in response to honest critique, you run the risk of alienating your readers.
There are two considerations when reviewing: PLOT and SKILL.
PLOT is story. It's a matter of taste and a matter of personal likes/dislikes. I will try to comment on what I call the internal logic. Does the story have a consistent framework? Or do 'miracles' have to occur every other chapter to keep the story moving? Do the characters act according to their backstory and history? Or does the author u-turn or even 'retcon' to go a completely different way, ignoring the fact that three chapters back she had the character saying she would sooner die than go that way.
SKILL, on the other hand, is observable. There is a basic standard. SKILL is not a matter of taste, it's a learned ability; or rather a cluster of abilities: This word is spelled this way; a question has this punctuation; with a new speaker, begin a new paragraph; and so on. This can be taught usually by pointing out errors and possible corrections.
'How to Review' by Juno Magic (Honestly the best guide I've ever come across.)
Also, FLAMERS TAKE NOTE
If you're going to flame, at least have the balls to do it while signed in. I moderate all guest reviews. Out and out trolling and profanity gets an automatic DELETE and feeds my inspiration to actually write MORE of what you're flaming about :) I'm just a little stubborn like that.
Not that I think my writing is worth it (because if you're desperate enough to do it to me I really have to wonder about your intelligence) BUT I'll state my views anyway because I dislike it on principle:
If you steal my hard work, I shall hunt you down like the dog you are and bitchslap your teeth out of your mouth, while removing your eyeballs with a SPORK and your fingers with hedge clippers.
Have a good day.